Disappointed Black voters pull support, imperil Biden reelection

President Joe Biden speaks at the Congressional Black Caucus’ 2023 Phoenix Awards Dinner, Saturday, Sept. 23, 2023, in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

By Jeff Murdock | The Washington Times | Monday, November 27, 2023

Black voters say President Biden has abandoned his pledge to always have their backs and are threatening to withhold their support in 2024, and some are even drifting toward former President Donald Trump.

The lack of enthusiasm among Black voters could prove fatal to Mr. Biden‘s reelection chances.They formed the core of Mr. Biden‘s base in 2020, and a dip in just one or two battleground states, such as Georgia or Michigan, would likely determine the election outcome.

“I talk with many, many African Americans who are disappointed in the things Biden is doing,” said Raleigh Washington, who leads a religious organization aimed at helping the Black community. “He said an awful lot of things about helping African Americans, but his actions have not reflected those promises, and what he has done doesn’t really encourage or support me as an African African.”

David Dix, a Democratic Party strategist, argues that Mr. Biden has delivered on his promises to help lift the Black community but said he hasn’t promoted these efforts because the wars in the Middle East and Ukraine are taking so much of his bandwidth.

“Once he starts to connect his policies to improving the lives of African Americans, you will see that slippage slow down a bit,” he said. “Focusing on international affairs in Israel and Ukraine and less about how his programs are helping will cause slippage.”

A poll by The New York Times/Siena College revealed that 22% of Black voters in six battleground states would support Mr. Trump and 71% would back Mr. Biden in a theoretical rematch.

Those numbers don’t seem significant initially, but they show that Mr. Biden‘s support in Black communities is waning. Mr. Biden captured 92% of the Black vote in 2020, compared with 8% who turned out for Mr. Trump, according to Pew Research.

Just days after Mr. Biden won the 2020 election, he acknowledged the debt he owed the Black community for his victory, thanked them for “having his back” and vowed to always have theirs.

A Republican presidential candidate hasn’t won more than 12% of the Black vote since Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956.

Mr. Biden has moved to shore up support from minority voters.

Before Mr. Biden‘s Thanksgiving break, he taped three interviews with Black and Hispanic radio shows, including “Get Up! Mornings” with Erica Campbell and “The Rickey Smiley Morning Show.” During the interviews, Mr. Biden discussed how his economic agenda benefited Black and Hispanic communities.

Black community leaders have no one reason for the erosion of support for Mr. Biden, but many are quick to point to soaring grocery, gasoline and housing prices. Black families were hit particularly hard when inflation reached a 40-year-high last year because they trailed White Americans in income, wealth, financial savings and homeownership.

“We are still feeling the pains of the economic reset,” said Stephen Broden, a Black conservative who founded Ebony Berean to fight the culture wars in Black communities.?

“A nosebleed in the White community is a hemorrhage in the Black community,” he said. “The investment that Biden promised is not evident, and there has been a gross failure here that has awakened our community to the fact that the Democratic Party has exploited our community for votes and given us nothing in return.”

Wage gains have cooled more dramatically for Black workers than other Americans.The median weekly earnings for full-time employed Blacks people when Mr. Biden took office in January 2021 was $304. It was $299 in the third quarter of this year, according to Labor Department statistics.

For all other communities, it was $365 per week.

The unemployment rate for Black workers fell to a record low 4.7% in April but rose to 5.8% in October.That outpaced the increase for American workers overall.

Mr. Broden said Black America’s economic woes are exacerbated by Biden policies that have led to record levels of illegal immigration.

“There is a seething that is happening in our community when they look at what is happening at the border and allowing people to come in and take jobs at the lower part of the economic spectrum, which are jobs taken by the Black community,” he said.

The administration disputes claims that it hasn’t helped the Black community. Officials point to money from legislative victories such as Mr. Biden‘s tax and climate law, infrastructure programs and COVID-19 relief.

Stephen Benjamin, director of the White House Office of Public Engagement, said the president has kept his word to minority communities.

“Since Day One, the president has taken a whole-of-government approach to advancing racial equity and enhancing the lives of Black families across the nation. He’s kept his word by increasing investment and economic opportunity in Black communities, improving health outcomes, providing historic support for [historically Black colleges and universities], and taking action to reform our criminal justice system, just to name a few,” he said in a statement toThe Washington Times.

The tax and climate law, dubbed the Inflation Reduction Act, commits at least 40% of certain federal investments to Black and underserved communities. The White House also said households can save as much as 30% with tax credits for environmentally friendly home renovations. Those tax credits apply to everyone, not just the Black community.

The COVID-19 relief, known as the American Rescue Plan, included provisions to expand the child tax credit. The administration claims the credit has helped lower poverty rates for Black children and provided $39 billion to help child care providers stay open during a period of economic chaos. One in five child care providers are Black, according to data from the administration.

The president’s infrastructure bill also includes provisions aimed at repairing Black neighborhoods that are separated from larger communities by highways, thus limiting their connections to economic opportunities.

Mr. Biden has set a goal of increasing the share of federal contracting funds to minority-owned businesses to 50% by 2025, up from its current level of 10%.

“I think you’ll see these polls as a legitimate pivot point for the president to recognize how important that voting bloc is and just how much attention he is paying to them,” Mr. Dix said. “When that happens, you’ll see Black voters coming back.”

Mr. Washington said Mr. Biden‘s investments have done little to improve the lives of Black Americans. He noted higher grocery prices, including $5 for a dozen eggs.

Mr. Biden‘s reelection campaign has amplified its message to Black voters in recent weeks by spending $25 million on television ads in Phoenix, Atlanta, Detroit, Philadelphia and other areas.The campaign also launched a program targeting predominantly Black neighborhoods in Milwaukee and other areas.

The ads, claiming that Mr. Biden “is putting in the work for Black America,” are part of the largest and earliest ad splurge any campaign has ever placed in Black media outlets.

In another sign that the Biden campaign is worried about Black voters, the campaign dispatched Vice President Kamala Harris to tour historically Black colleges and universities to encourage students to vote.

The administration says its commitment isn’t limited to economic investments. Officials say Mr. Biden has appointed a record number of Black judges, including Black women. Among those is the appointment of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman on the Supreme Court.

Mr. Broden dismisses the judicial appointments.

“It is tokenism at its best,” he said. “If you look at the economic conditions of the community, our kids are lagging far behind. So what, you appointed Black judges? What does that have to do with my ability to put food on the table?” he said.

The abortion issue helped deliver some big victories to Democrats on Election Day this month but won’t go as far with Black voters, who tend to be more religious and conservative on social issues than urban Whites.

Polls suggest that young Black voters have soured on Mr. Biden more than older Black voters. An American Enterprise Institute study released in September found that only 57.9% of Black people ages 18 to 49 approve of Mr. Biden‘s handling of the presidency, compared with 78.9% of Black people 50 and older.The poll found that only 36.3% of Black people ages 18 to 49 say Mr. Biden has accomplished “a good or great deal,” while 72% older than 50 agree.

The bigger concern for Democrats is not that Black voters will flock to Mr. Trump but that they will opt to stay home on Election Day. Some evidence shows that is happening.

Voters in Louisiana last month elected the first Republican governor in nearly a decade. Only about 36% of the state’s 3 million registered voters went to the polls, but the drop appears to be even stronger among Black voters.

In 10 of the 15 Louisiana parishes where at least 40% of the residents are Black, the turnout was below the state average of 36%, including in the parishes with the state’s two largest cities, New Orleans and Baton Rouge, according to data from the Louisiana secretary of state.

Mr. Biden‘s tepid response from the Black community is affecting his reelection at the local level. An EPIC-MRA poll released Saturday found that only 62% of Black respondents would support Mr. Biden for a second term. Of those who didn’t support the president, 17% said they would vote for Mr. Trump and 17% remained undecided.


Copyright © 2023 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.


DEI Dilemmas Abound: Let’s Attempt to Make Sense Out of Nonsense!| The Epoch Times

By Kevin McGary 11/28/2023

DEI-driven activists are reimagining medical practice to deliver healthcare depending upon a patient’s race, sex, gender, and rank on the “oppressor” scale. Patients are treated or not treated based upon their race, ethnicity, religion, sex, gender identity, social class, ability, immigration status, and more. How does that make sense? Measuring a patient’s political-social worthiness cannot be the doctors’ job when healthcare is needed.

Commentary

Continued from Part I

A ubiquitous global trend toward Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) exists. This new trend’s emergence brings dilemmas confirming profound hypocrisy and grotesque duplicity, so it must be rejected, not celebrated.

Ignoring obviously inconvenient truths about DEI and its unprincipled hypocrisy means hiding our heads in the sand. That isn’t comforting or practical; it’s cowardice! It won’t be easy, but we must attempt to make sense out of DEI nonsense.

DEI Versus Sound Medical Practice

When DEI tactics and practices influence medical practitioners and their responses to life-or-death decisions, everyone needs to pay close attention.

Some medical providers in the United States and Canada have begun incorporating so-called social justice, anti-racism, anti-oppression, and cultural safety to promote “equity” in medicine. But why dump the Hippocratic Oath that mandates “first do no harm”? The Oath already aimed toward providing everyone with justice and equality in healthcare, ensuring patients needing care will receive it. The Oath doesn’t look at skin color or other attributes; it calls for medical care committed to the “first do no harm” principle for all.

DEI-driven activists are reimagining medical practice to deliver healthcare depending upon a patient’s race, sex, gender, and rank on the “oppressor” scale. Patients are treated or not treated based upon their race, ethnicity, religion, sex, gender identity, social class, ability, immigration status, and more. How does that make sense? Measuring a patient’s political-social worthiness cannot be the doctors’ job when healthcare is needed.

When practitioners consider arcane factors of race, sex, etc., before helping a patient in an emergency, they are committing malpractice. The “standard of care” for physicians requires treatment that meets the acceptable performance of a practitioner in the field. That standard nowhere excuses poor performance that the doctor justifies by the patient’s race, ethnicity, sex, gender, or “oppressor” status.

Proper medical practice requires a doctor to maintain excellence in knowledge and skills, but also to recognize the doctor’s areas of non-expertise. Patients typically check a doctor’s track record and competency level before surgery. Patients don’t accept a “politically correct” surgeon for his or her social justice and DEI training; they want the best doctor available to them because of the doctor’s professional skills.

DEI advocacy and related practices within healthcare are already impacting lifesaving services and care, with no end in sight. Lives will be lost as a socio-political agenda expressly mandates unequal treatment of patients.

DEI Dismantles Education

The medical/healthcare field is just one example of DEI degrading quality and fairness. Another is the arena of education.

Believe it or not, many “educated” intellectuals assert that math, science, and English are racist power vectors. They oppose any performance testing in those subjects to measure intellectual acuity or accuracy. They allege that these ancient fundamental subjects, dating back hundreds or thousands of years, all came from “white racist” academics who sought to retain “supremacy” while undermining black development. Their claims fail the test of history while they stir up hate and resentment.

The underlying DEI “equity” thread is that black and other ethnic minority students should not be held to achievement standards concerning any academic material that white people created or developed in the past. DEI demands that everyone automatically assume that the foundational knowledge basics are infused with racist and supremacist ideologies intended to undermine blacks and continually oppress them.

DEI activists call for rejecting the presumed racist subjects and warning children against the dangers of the “white” works, ideas, and subjects. The new paradigm of equity in education urges that any “white racist” intellectual works, regardless of how they benefited societies, must be rejected as oppressive to blacks.

Sober thinking, however, means realizing the anti-education idea is obviously irrational. The DEI schemes are unserious and deem blacks as inherently inferior. Basically, DEI says: Blacks cannot learn, so education must be lessened.

Whether knowingly or ignorantly, “woke educators” broadly assert black underachievement, building upon a Darwinian theory that black students have innate learning deficiencies and so they are handicapped by oppressive school subjects. Think for a moment about how the “woke” ideas about education further those longstanding racist hypocritical tropes!

Generations of blacks have studied existing curricula from all subjects, mastered them, and are now living incredibly successful lives. Yet DEI advocates say blacks are innately inferior, i.e., incapable. They believe the only way to get black students to graduate and achieve at the same level as other ethnicities is to bend the curriculum curve downward. Society must cast off any notions of academic excellence because they are imposed by white racist paternalist hegemony.

Sincere DEI professionals working in education, especially those assuring equity, should recognize that true equity in education means that black students have access to every opportunity and resource to learn that other students have. As private schools provide additional academic choice, sincere education reformers should endorse and encourage school choice programs for all students.

Forcing children into the “one size fits all” public school paradigm contradicts “equity” by denying educational choices tailored to each child’s skill, abilities, and interests. Not having choices for learning environments that best suit the child is what causes broad inequities in future outcomes for individuals. It is a systemic lack of school choices—not purported “racist curriculums”—that causes issues with future hiring and advancement opportunities.

Hypocritically, advocates of DEI typically reject school choice. Why? DEI advocates do not embrace and champion school choice because they are more committed to a communistic structure (state-run education) and have adopted a Darwinist mindset that assumes some ethnicities innately lack learning capacities based on race. The truly uplifting pathway would commit to seeing students as individuals who can all achieve if given equal opportunities.

There is no need to degrade academics or downgrade standards to accommodate “the poor blacks.” For countless generations, blacks have demonstrated the ability to achieve excellence and overcome any barriers. Tropes that connote black inferiority may make progressive “do-gooders” feel warm and fuzzy as they condescend toward blacks, but those who espouse these ideas must be corrected.

Guilt-ridden proponents of DEI often attempt simplistic, condescending, racialized perspectives to reinforce that blacks are incapable of competing in education. Nonsense!

Corporations Surrender to Contradictions

Corporations have also fallen into the trappings and associated dilemmas of DEI. Many corporate elites proudly “beat their chests” and virtue signal about “justice,” diversity, and equality. In reality, they act more as groveling cowards than stalwarts who should stand on principles of corporate fairness and equality.

The cultural tide of Marxism has enveloped most businesses and organizations via the latest tactic of DEI initiatives. Still, instead of business “leaders” combatting and rejecting brazen anti-capitalist Marxist schemes, they humbly bow in deference to them. Why?

We have seen corporations and global organizations embrace and support Black Lives Matter (BLM) even as BLM boasted of being anti-capitalist and “revolutionary Marxists.” Most major sports teams piled on alongside corporate donors to boost BLM coffers to an estimated billion dollars.

Even if one feels bad about George Floyd’s death, why would any organizations align and support diehard Marxists as they proudly disdain and threaten them as “victimizers,” “colonialists,” “oppressors,” and evil “capitalists”? A principled response from corporations would be to push back on BLM and demand that they publicly reject Marxism before any donations could be released.

Here’s the dilemma: How can DEI initiatives inspired by and rooted in Marxism be supported and embraced by free-market/capitalist entities? Corporations and entities that espouse DEI not only put themselves at significant risk due to federal and state employment non-discrimination laws by intentionally hiring and giving promotions solely based on skin color, but they entangle themselves in Marxist duplicity by accepting forms of Marxism while operating supposedly as capitalist.

DEI’s internal contradictions, and ultimately, anti-black theories run against any genuine commitment to justice and equality for all. We cannot make sense of DEI because it is riddled with noxious ideas. The fair, reasonable, and uplifting course is to combat DEI nonsense wherever it appears.


 Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

This article was originally written: 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/opinion/dei-dilemmas-abound-lets-attempt-to-make-sense-out-of-nonsense-5537445

EP. 3162 PULLING BACK THE CURTAIN ON THE LATEST MARXIST ATTEMPT TO UNDERMINE AMERICAN VALUES WITH AUTHOR KEVIN MCGARY

[THANKSGIVING NOV 23] The BCP Podcast. Season 3, Episode 162 Run Time: 1 Hour 1 Minute

In this episode: Author and founder of Every Black Life Matters, Kevin McGary and I talk about the current push for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion and its true origins in Darwinism, Racism and Marxism and what this means for America. And more importantly, what we can do to stop this madness in the workplace and in schools.

I GOT MY ORIGINAL TWITTER ACCOUNT BACK! PLEASE FOLLOW: ⁠https://twitter.com/Black_C_Patriot⁠

PICK UP SOME MERCH TO LOOK COOL AND SUPPORT OUR WORK: ⁠https://bcp-merch.creator-spring.com⁠

Also, check out Juniorette and Nana’s YouTube show, NOTHING BUT THE NEWS! : ⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu3lxLxp3ZuJRga7gF9KIyg

Here are links to Kevin the training Kevin referenced as well as his book:

Roots of DEI Explained | Kevin McGary

Kevin McGary, President of the Frederick Douglass Foundation of California

#California has been creating more and more laws to embrace #DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion). Today we invite Kevin McGary, President of the Frederick Douglass Foundation of California, to talk about the origin and development of DEI, as well as its impact in the future. His book is DEI in 3D: Deciphering Designs, Demands And Dilemmas of DEI

Marx Infects Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

People hold up signs during a rally against critical race theory (CRT) being taught in schools at the Loudoun County Government center in Leesburg, Va., on June 12, 2021. (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

The Epoch Times | By Kevin McGary 10/27/2023 | Updated:10/29/2023

Commentary

Global multinational powers, institutions, and nation-states have adopted and enshrined diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) as the way to help diversify professions, colleges, and workplaces. A history of racism and inequality has plagued many cultures and societies, so DEI arose as a possible tool to help alleviate the harms and end maltreatment and disparities.

As with any tool, DEI should be assessed for its rationality and results. Leaders and citizens both should ask, “Does DEI help put an end to racial inequalities, or does it worsen and prolong them? Does it truly foster social unity, or does it harmfully produce more division, anger, and disdain?”

History confirms that Charles Darwin’s derelict evolutionary theories profoundly impacted the foundation of racism, “supremacy,” and inequality. Those theories said that blacks were not “equal” and instead were equated to “apes,” “gorillas,” and “savages.”

Darwin’s theories gave “scientific justification” for treating blacks differently and unequally because blacks were deemed innately inferior. Result: Blacks and all other non-white ethnicities were maligned and viewed as dirty and inferior.

Darwin’s racist theories profoundly impacted Karl Marx’s beliefs. As Marx and Engels considered Darwin a mentor, they integrated Darwinism into Marx’s philosophy.

Marx accepted Darwin’s racist beliefs that humankind evolved over time and in stages and that the various ethnicities were therefore not created equal. This meant Marx believed that blacks and other ethnicities had innate deficiencies and limitations compared to the ideals he cherished in whites.

This turned out to be troubling for Marx. He felt he was superior because he was white, yet his own personal success was miserable. He never “measured up” to his contemporaries. Instead of taking personal responsibility and becoming more competent and zealous about personal achievement, Marx blamed the “capitalist system” for his failures.

Marx’s lifetime of laziness, joblessness, and mooching, while fathering eight children by two women, created poverty that drove his insatiable bitterness, jealousy, and hate directed at those who attained success and accomplishments. Marx felt self-important by embracing communist philosophy as it forged a movement for social “change” grounded upon perpetual grievances, collective hate, and unending bitterness.

Marxist philosophy said all people are inevitably divided into two classes. Marx saw the division as basically the “haves” versus the “have nots.” Marx termed the two sides as the exploited class (the “proletariat”) versus the ruling class (the “bourgeoisie”).

Marx loathed successful people, like the bourgeoisie, as much because of his own bitterness as anything else. He thought history would inevitably lead to a proletarian uprising and takeover to achieve a “communist utopia.”

Marxism Expands Beyond His Grave

To this day, Marx’s philosophy encourages the “exploited” proletariat class to rise up and control or eliminate the bourgeoisie “ruling class.” Vladimir Lenin, the Bolshevik who launched the late Soviet Union, upshifted Marxism to achieve utopia by mobilizing the “masses” to undermine capitalism and meritocracy.

The Marxist-Leninist movement aims to create a “classless society.” In practice, this always means a “classless” communist society where the government owns and runs all productive enterprises, which requires controlling all the people to make sure everyone has “equal” everything.

The Marxist-Leninist idea of “equality” pivots 180 degrees away from the standards and traditions of “equal opportunity” and toward a new standard of “equal outcome.” And outcome is one of DEI’s fundamental principles.

DEI uses words and methods drawn from the Marxist/communist vision. It sensitizes and conditions participants toward an inevitable adoption of tenets of a “classless” society. Notably, DEI’s primary focus upon “equity” (equal outcomes) means wholesale rejecting of all moral standards of treating people fairly via equal opportunity.

Instead, DEI presses for unequal treatment, frankly immoral treatment, of people, to produce the hazy vision of “equal outcomes.” Such equity demands that all identity groups (race, gender, etc.) share in equal outcomes irrespective of competencies, skill, or individual effort.

Connecting the historical dots, we see that today’s DEI trends are still motivated by neo-Marxian jealousy, animus, and contempt toward people who have zeal for achievement and success based on merit. Since humankind is not made up of robots, every individual is endowed with varying degrees of God-given skills and talents. The wide variations among individuals mean several kinds of “inequality” will always exist.

The trends toward measuring everyone based on a scale of equal outcomes, i.e., equal compensation, promotion, and career advancement, irrespective of core competencies, is a scheme straight out of Marx’s bitterness about his basically failing life. Marx’s demands for equal outcomes were fundamentally designed to usher in his dream of a communist utopia. Without doubt, his arcane and unscrupulous designs for “planned economies” destroy the power that free markets and meritocracy bring to enrich everyone.

Ethically principled environments attempting to incorporate equality, trust, and commitment toward unity are harmed and undermined by neo-Marxist DEI initiatives. Typically, equity is used as a spiked club to mete out retribution and “get even” with those deemed “oppressors” or “victimizers” (namely whites)—not to unify.

DEI-inspired initiatives can achieve better outcomes by modifying the DEI paradigm and shifting to a more principled DOI (Diversity, Opportunity, Inclusion) mindset.

Sincere diversity initiatives should create environments that value every individual’s life experiences and background while promoting unity and honoring respect. When diversity practices encourage equal opportunity instead of trying to force equal outcomes, organizations can expect improved morale and unity.

Designing environments to reflect a commitment to the menagerie of flourishing humanity requires a complete rejection of “equity” and all its modern-day collectivist/communist baggage and accessories. Likewise, diversity’s most significant feature is the inspiring of different viewpoints. Working together from different perspectives promotes harmony when tackling problems or attempting to accomplish focused objectives.

Actively welcoming criticisms and coordinating different plausible solutions will increase the diversity of ideas within organizational thinking. If all contributors feel their input and perspectives are encouraged, honored, and respected, this can result in a rich, unifying experience for employees.

When corporate unity is increased, overall corporate performance should accelerate. A sincere and concerted effort encouraging equal opportunity for people with diversified skills, political leanings, ethnicity, sex/gender, etc., can produce a “melting pot” of diversity that achieves a pipeline of opportunistic successes. That’s what the motto “e pluribus unum” envisions.

The concept of “Diversity is Our Strength” can become true where race and identity-groups are not the focus, but instead social and work environments:

  • foster clear and relevant communication

  • willingly adapt to change and receive diverse input

  • celebrate the human ability to “freely think” out loud without fear or judgment

  • show genuine interest in others and continually commit to building relationships

  • honor individual differences and value others

  • actively seek to understand others

  • accept accountability for self and others

Such environments achieve the true virtues of diversity.

This diversity approach dovetails directly with true inclusion. To best encourage inclusive and diverse environments means moving away from DEI (with its equity focus) and embracing DOI (with an opportunity focus)! Universally recognizing and including everyone, regardless of group identity, leads to humanity working together and completely rejecting diabolical theories that foment violence, hatred, and chaos.

It’s time to reject fallacious and dishonest tropes that separate people into warring camps instead of unifying people. It’s time to reject adolescent, unsuccessful theories that divide. As mature adults, we must now fully and with intentionality embrace the reality: We can be one united family.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.


Kevin McGary

Author

Kevin McGary is a Ministry leader, entrepreneur, author, and public speaker. He serves as chairman of the Frederick Douglass Foundation of California, is an executive with the Douglass Leadership Institute, and also a co-founder of Every Black Life Matters (EBLM). EBLM is a moral-based and faith-based alternative to Black Lives Matter. Kevin has worked as a professional in Information Technology for the past 35 years and has written six books. His most recent book releases include “WOKEd UP!” (2022) and “DEI in 3D” (July 2023).